Cart: 0 Items :: Checkout
Guaranteed Sports Picks
HOME    |    BUY PICKS    |    FREE PICKS    |    SCORES & ODDS    |    LEADERBOARD    |    JOIN NOW    |    LOGIN
Minnesota Wild
vs
Toronto Maple Leafs
Today's Featured Sports Pick

Game Date:
03/03/2016
7:35pm EST

Lines:
Minnesota -1.5
Toronto +1.5

Total:
Over 5 (-127)
Under 5 (+115)

Community Picks: Minnesota Wild 0% vs Toronto Maple Leafs 0%

Minnesota Wild and Toronto Maple Leafs Thread

Team Tweets & News Articles
Minnesota Wild
The back-and-forth dynamic of Minnesota's season is again taking a positive swing, and competition on a two-game trip against the worst teams in the Eastern Conference could allow it to grow more significant. The Wild visit Toronto on Thursday night, and the Maple Leafs are beginning a four-game homestand with a three-game losing streak weighing them down. Minnesota (29-25-10), which finishes the trip in Buffalo on Saturday, defeated Colorado 6-3 Tuesday to string together consecutive wins after a three-game skid. Continue to Article
March 03, 2016 12:05:am EST
Minnesota Wild
(Ed. Note: The column formerly known as the Puck Daddy Power Rankings. Ryan Lambert takes a look at some of the biggest issues and stories in the NHL, and counts them down.) 13. Jim Nill Dude made one trade all day, and it was giving up a roster player, a decent prospect, and a second- or perhaps first-round pick for Kris Russell? Good lord. Russell is terrible. Maybe you think Dallas has a critical lack of defensemen who are willing to block shots, which is the only thing Russell is good at. But he's only good at it because he gets a lot of practice because he can't clear his own zone. He was the worst defenseman on the Calgary Flames. And they employ Deryk Engelland. I don't know how you justify giving up a package of anything for a player like that. The good news for Nill is that there's basically no chance of that conditional pick becoming a first-rounder anyway. 12. Jim Benning How on earth are you the GM of a team that has already run aground and has basically no hope of making the playoffs, and not move your many older, pending UFAs? I mean, this is true of any GM whose team isn't going to make the playoffs but held onto players they could have moved for, y'know, literally anything. But this is especially true of Benning, who seems to be shambling through the second half of this season completely clueless. Okay so Dan Hamhuis and Radim Vrbata had full and limited no-trades respectively, but good lord the lack of effort here is astonishing. It shouldn't have come down to deadline day before he realized this was going to happen, and there should have been some beach-softening at the very least to prepare people for the eventuality that neither player would be traded. I don't know what constitutes a “concrete offer” for Hamhuis (no team to which Vrbata would move approached the Canucks about him, so fair enough). But “literally anything” is better than losing Hamhuis for nothing. He's not a good GM, folks. But at least he didn't trade for anyone. 11. Doug Armstrong The Blues needed to make moves and did not do so. Like this isn't one of those “It's okay to stand pat, I guess,” situations that a few teams like Tampa or Washington found themselves in. The Blues needed to get better — probably a lot better — to even get out of the first round in their divisional playoffs. Their inability to do so because of cap mismanagement and all the injuries they've suffered created a situation that prevented them from doing so. Sad but true. Doesn't change the fact that, even as Armstrong's hands were tied, a Houdini-like escape was necessary, not just a thing that would have been nice to see. 10. Don Sweeney Okay so the Bruins technically got better because Lee Stempniak is good and John-Michael Liles is probably better than the other not-good veterans kicking around on their blue line. But also: Why? Like, the Bruins aren't particularly good or anything. They might — miiiiiight — win a round. This doesn't get them over that hump. Trading for anyone but a clear No. 1 defenseman wouldn't have, and that obviously wasn't going to happen. And with this team's window closing fast (or perhaps already closed, thanks to chronic mismanagement like the stuff on display before the deadline) the need to both be borderline competitive and restock for the future is clear. So giving up four(!!!) draft picks (and a non-prospect) doesn't make a lot of sense to get guys who will barely move the needle. Moreover, let's not forget the Bruins had Stempniak on a tryout and didn't think enough of him to offer even the veteran minimum, so giving up two assets to New Jersey is additionally foolish. But hey, it's not like Sweeney traded for Kris Russell or anything. (And he probably should have traded Loui Eriksson because he's gonna lose him for nothing on July 1. Oh well folks!) 9. Bryan Murray It seems to me that there was probably a softer market on Monday than most people expected but that doesn't excuse Murray's approach. Every rumor out of Ottawa suggested that he was significantly undervaluing the few players who actually helped the cause, and his action in trading Shane Prince — a young player who's more than serviceable in his current role — for a third-round pick. Maybe that's what you say the market bore, but he shouldn't have been traded in the first place, is the point. He was also rumored to be shopping Patrick Wiercioch, for reasons unknowable, and ended up not doing that, which is fine. 8.  Joe Sakic The Eric Gelinas-as-reclamation-project move might not be a terrible one, but I cannot for the life of me figure out why he thought Mikkel Boedker was going to help his team more than Alex Tanguay. Yes, Tanguay only has four goals this season, but he's at least been a possession driver on a truly awful possession team (plus-1.4 relative corsi, etc.), and Boedker has been a possession drag on a team that's nearly as bad. Boedker has also racked up a fair bit of his points on the power play, which is nice and everything I guess, but at 5-on-5, Tanguay out-produces him. Oops. Ooooooops. Also: The Avs are going to get annihilated by whichever team they play in the first round. Why do teams think making the playoffs only to be slaughtered is a good thing? Might as well try to grab a draft pick. And that's if they make it. Minnesota got marginally better and is better anyway. The only reason the Avs are even in a playoff spot right now is that they have games in hand on everyone behind them. I'm much more confident in the Wild finishing well than the Avs, who were buyers despite being awful. This was a dumb deadline day for Sakic. Bye. Continue to Article
March 02, 2016 10:32:am EST
Toronto Maple Leafs
The Washington Capitals continued to stock up for a potential playoff run by acquiring forward Daniel Winnik from the Toronto Maple Leafs in a deal that sent away their longest tenured player. The Capitals traded forward Brooks Laich, defenseman Connor Carrick and a 2016 second-round pick to Toronto for Winnik and a 2016 fifth-round pick. The move represents an upgrade for the NHL's top team and also opens up salary-cap space ahead of the trade deadline. Continue to Article
February 29, 2016 12:29:am EST
Toronto Maple Leafs
Max Pacioretty scored twice and the Montreal Canadiens beat the Toronto Maple Leafs 4-1 on Saturday night for their 10th straight victory in the rivalry. Alex Galchenyuk and Devante Smith-Pelly also scored for Montreal, and Mike Condon had 31 saves. Matt Hunwick scored Toronto's only goal, and Jonathan Bernier stopped 32 shots. Continue to Article
February 27, 2016 10:21:pm EST
Toronto Maple Leafs
James Reimer was about to tuck in for a nap when his phone rang. It was a New Jersey area code. He knew what it concerned.   Seconds later, Toronto Maple Leafs GM Lou Lamoriello was telling Reimer that he was now a member of the San Jose Sharks. “It’s sports. It’s hockey. It’s a forever-changing thing. I had a lot of good years here. It’s definitely a weird feeling going somewhere else,” said Reimer. Reimer was drafted in the fourth round by the Leafs in 2006. He came up through the Toronto Marlies, played with the Maple Leafs for six seasons over 207 games and seven playoff games – the less said about that seventh game in 2013 , the better, of course. But after that 2013 run that saw him go 19-8-5 with a .924 save percentage, Reimer could never nail down a starting role. Some of this wasn’t his fault, as the Leafs didn’t exactly have faith in him – as was evidenced by their quest to acquire Roberto Luongo and their eventual acquisition of Jonathan Bernier. What does Reimer recall from his days with the Leafs? “Just the good times, just the good times,” he said. “There are going to be highs and lows. When the crowd got going there. When you have success on a roll. Those are the times I’ll remember. The fan base there, the whole city, how they can get behind you. I can’t thank them enough for making my time more special.” This has been a strong season for Reimer until recently, when the Leafs began aggressively dismantling their team. His .918 save percentage is solid; ditto his 2.49 goals against average. He credited his coaches for it. “The system we had in place there had more structure than we had in the past. You had more of an idea of what was coming at you,” said Reimer, who also worked on his puck tracking in the offseason. He arrives in San Jose as Martin Jones’s backup, and with a chance to contribute to a team making a playoff push. “I’m excited. Obviously San Jose has been a great team, a really good organization for the last 10 years,” said Reimer. “Given this opportunity to come to a team like San Jose, a team poised to do some damage, it’s really exciting.” -- Greg Wyshynski  is a writer for Yahoo Sports. Contact him at  puckdaddyblog@yahoo.com  or  find him on Twitter.  His book,  TAKE YOUR EYE OFF THE PUCK , is  available on Amazon  and wherever books are sold. MORE FROM YAHOO HOCKEY Continue to Article
February 27, 2016 4:44:pm EST
 
Previous Matchups:
View Available Sports Picks View Cart View Sports Picks